This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Thu Apr 18 16:54:10 2024 Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:34:07 +0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751109AbWHPLde (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:34 -0400 Received: from spirit.analogic.com ([204.178.40.4]:36618 "EHLO spirit.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042AbWHPLde convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:34 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([10.112.50.11]) by phoenix.analogic.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:33 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Received: from chaos.analogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.analogic.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7GBXXkW010576; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:33 -0400 Received: (from linux-os@localhost) by chaos.analogic.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k7GBXVQU010575; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:31 -0400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 11:33:33.0206 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE15D360:01C6C127] content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Maximum number of processes in Linux Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:31 -0400 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <44E2ED07.6070203@aitel.hist.no> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Maximum number of processes in Linux Thread-Index: AcbBJ84fPpQ7gKBlQMaT0GcoKhLfCw== References: <3420082f0608151059s40373a0bg4a1af3618c2b1a05@mail.gmail.com> <20060815182219.GL8776@1wt.eu> <44E2ED07.6070203@aitel.hist.no> From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" To: "Helge Hafting" Cc: "Willy Tarreau" , "Irfan Habib" , "Linux kernel" Reply-To: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Helge Hafting wrote: > linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: >> Yep.... >> >> #include >> #include >> int main() >> { >> unsigned long i; >> for(i = 0; ; i++) >> { >> switch(fork()) >> { >> case 0: // kid >> pause(); >> break; >> case -1: // Failed >> printf("%lu\n", i); >> kill(0, SIGTERM); >> exit(0); >> default: >> break; >> } >> } >> return 0; >> } >> >> Shows a consistent 6140. >> > Doesn't work here. Without ulimit, I wasn't surprised > about the resulting OOM mess. > > Problem was, it never stopped. I expected OOM to kill > this program, and quite possibly lots of other running programs > as well. What I got, was ever-rolling OOM messages > with stack traces inbetween. > 2.6.18-rc4-mm1 never recovered and had to be killed by sysrq. > > Helge Hafting Script started on Wed 16 Aug 2006 07:18:48 AM EDT LINUX> gcc -o xxx xxx.c LINUX> ./xxx 6138 Terminated LINUX> ./xxx 6138 Terminated LINUX> ./xxx 6138 Terminated LINUX> ulimit unlimited LINUX> uname -r 2.6.16.24 LINUX> cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 774572 kB MemFree: 381984 kB Buffers: 154120 kB Cached: 31000 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 74908 kB Inactive: 130816 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree: 0 kB LowTotal: 774572 kB LowFree: 381984 kB SwapTotal: 907664 kB SwapFree: 907660 kB Dirty: 28 kB Writeback: 0 kB Mapped: 34100 kB Slab: 177948 kB CommitLimit: 1294948 kB Committed_AS: 31080 kB PageTables: 804 kB VmallocTotal: 515796 kB VmallocUsed: 3524 kB VmallocChunk: 511568 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 Hugepagesize: 4096 kB LINUX> exit Script done on Wed 16 Aug 2006 07:19:48 AM EDT Runs fine here. I'm using 2.6.14.24. Maybe your kernel version still has an OEM bug??? Since the forked process never touches any of its memory, it shouldn't use anything except space in the kernel for a new task- structure and space in user-space for stack. COW wouldn't have happened yet. I don't see how you get out of memory before you run out of PIDs! The first instance of the fork failing should cause a signal to be sent to all the children, killing them: case -1: // Failed printf("%lu\n", i); kill(0, SIGTERM); exit(0); I can set /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory to either 1 or 0 with the same effect, no out-of-memory errors. Maybe your kernel version has a bug? Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.16.24 on an i686 machine (5592.62 BogoMips). New book: http://www.AbominableFirebug.com/ _  **************************************************************** The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to DeliveryErrors@analogic.com - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them. Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/