[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RHEL5 PATCH 2/4] VFS: Make inode numbers 64-bits
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:32:57AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Al Viro <> wrote:
> > NAK. There's no need to touch i_ino and a lot of reasons for not doing
> > that.
> Like all those printks that write ambiguous messages because they can't report
> the full inode number? I'm not so worried about those because they're for the
> most part debugging messages, but still, they *can* report invalid information
> because i_ino is not big enough in error and warning messages.

In fs-independent code? How many of those do we actually have?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-15 11:05    [W:0.076 / U:74.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site