[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RHEL5 PATCH 2/4] VFS: Make inode numbers 64-bits
Al Viro <> wrote:

> NAK. There's no need to touch i_ino and a lot of reasons for not doing
> that.

Like all those printks that write ambiguous messages because they can't report
the full inode number? I'm not so worried about those because they're for the
most part debugging messages, but still, they *can* report invalid information
because i_ino is not big enough in error and warning messages.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-15 10:35    [W:0.066 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site