Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - support checkstack | Date | Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:57:59 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 05:17, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:45:48AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > > > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. > > > > Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we > > ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside > > checkstack. > > There is no use of the symbol SUBARCH in arch/i386. While this may be > jarring to people who know and love Voyager, it doesn't break > anything. > > We could do what you suggest, but that sounds unnecessary. > > I'd rather either > leave things as they are Yes, and make the script check if it ARCH=um or not (which is obvious for now - nobody really wants a clear abstraction here). > rename SUBARCH
-- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |