[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core
    On Sat, August 12, 2006 19:44, Peter Zijlstra said:
    > Euhm, right :-) long comes naturaly when I think about quantities op
    > pages. The adjust_memalloc_reserve() argument is an increment, a delta;
    > perhaps I should change that to long.

    Maybe, but having 16 TB of reserved memory seems plenty for a while.

    > Having them separate would allow ajust_memalloc_reserve() to be used by
    > other callers too (would need some extra locking).

    True, but currently memalloc_reserve isn't used in a sensible way,
    or I'm missing something.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-12 19:57    [W:0.023 / U:1.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site