[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core
On Sat, August 12, 2006 19:44, Peter Zijlstra said:
> Euhm, right :-) long comes naturaly when I think about quantities op
> pages. The adjust_memalloc_reserve() argument is an increment, a delta;
> perhaps I should change that to long.

Maybe, but having 16 TB of reserved memory seems plenty for a while.

> Having them separate would allow ajust_memalloc_reserve() to be used by
> other callers too (would need some extra locking).

True, but currently memalloc_reserve isn't used in a sensible way,
or I'm missing something.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-12 19:57    [W:0.051 / U:4.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site