lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
    Date
    On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:47, Jens Axboe wrote:
    > On Thu, Aug 10 2006, Jason Lunz wrote:
    > > In gmane.linux.kernel, you wrote:
    ]--snip--[
    > >
    > > It's not surprising you're not getting many bug reports. It's common for
    > > several things to go wrong during s2ram, and the user often ends up
    > > looking at a hung system with a dead screen. It takes some quality time
    > > with netconsole to even begin to narrow down that it's IDE hanging the
    > > system, after which you can *begin* solving the no-video-on-resume
    > > issue.
    >
    > I'm not on any of the suspend lists, I was merely comparing the
    > suspend-others or suspend-libata ration to suspend-ide on linux-kernel,
    > and the latter is clearly in the minority. I've used ide suspend quite a
    > bit myself, and never had issues with it (or whichever ones I saw
    > initially, I fixed). Of course it depends very much on the hardware. I'd
    > still say that ide suspend probably supports a much wider range of
    > hardware, than does libata suspend.

    As far as the suspend to disk is concerned, you are probably right, but
    I'm not sure about the suspend to RAM.

    Greetings,
    Rafael
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-10 21:59    [W:0.022 / U:61.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site