Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:52:34 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string |
| |
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Roman Zippel wrote: > > If you force everyone to use 64bit sector numbers, I don't understand how > > you can claim "still working just fine on 32bit"? > > 64bit sector numbers work just fine on 32-bit machines.
Depends on the definition of "fine".
> > At some point ext4 is probably going to be the de facto standard, which very > > many people want to use, because it has all the new features, which won't be > > ported to ext2/3. So I still don't understand, what's so wrong about a > > little tuning in both directions? > > Just seems like wasted effort to me.
I disagree. Many developer still brag about how Linux runs on about everything, but it's little steps like this, which make it more and more a joke.
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |