Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:16 -0400 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack |
| |
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.
> > Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining > Voyager users proper computers?
Yeah, that's a plan :-)
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |