[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by regarding reiser4 inclusion]
    > suspect, particularly with 7200/min (s)ATA crap. 

    Quoting myself (again):
    >> A quick'n'dirty ZFS-vs-UFS-vs-Reiser3-vs-Reiser4-vs-Ext3 'benchmark'

    Yeah, the test ran on a single SATA-Harddisk (quick'n'dirty).
    I'm so sorry but i don't have access to a $$$ Raid-System at home.

    Anyway: The test shows us that Reiser4 performed very good on my
    (common 0-8-15) hardware.

    > sdparm --clear=WCE /dev/sda # please.

    How about using /dev/emcpower* for the next benchmark?

    I mighty be able to re-run it in a few weeks if people are interested
    and if i receive constructive suggestions (= Postmark parameters,
    mkfs options, etc..)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-01 09:55    [W:0.019 / U:22.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site