Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:41:44 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote: >>> This patch defines: >>> * a generic boolean-type, named "bool" >>> * aliases to 0 and 1, named "false" and "true" >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se> >> >> Shouldn't this simply use _Bool? > > No sane person should use "_Bool" in real code. Unnecessary StudlyCaps > and unnecessary underscore. > > "bool" is far easier to type, and looks less weird. >
That wasn't the point. The point was that bool should be a typedef to _Bool instead of an enum.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |