Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Jul 2006 16:28:00 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [patch] spinlocks: remove 'volatile' |
| |
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> but we've been using that "+m" format for a long time already (and I > _think_ we did so at the suggestion of gcc people), and it would be much > better if the gcc documentation was just fixed here.
IIRC early 4.0 had problems with "+m" and did what the documentation says, but that got quickly fixed. Here is the old thread http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108384517900001&r=1&w=2
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |