lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: splice/tee bugs?
    On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:16:29 +0200
    Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:

    | On Sun, Jul 09 2006, Jens Axboe wrote:
    | > On Sat, Jul 08 2006, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
    | > >
    | > > Hi Jens,
    | > >
    | > > On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:41:32 +0200
    | > > Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
    | > >
    | > > | On Fri, Jul 07 2006, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
    | > > | > On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 04:07:49 -0700
    | > > | > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
    | > > | >
    | > > | > | On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 09:07:03 +0200
    | > > | > | "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> wrote:
    | > > | > |
    | > > | > | > c) Occasionally the command line just hangs, producing no output.
    | > > | > | > In this case I can't kill it with ^C or ^\. This is a
    | > > | > | > hard-to-reproduce behaviour on my (x86) system, but I have
    | > > | > | > seen it several times by now.
    | > > | > |
    | > > | > | aka local DoS. Please capture sysrq-T output next time.
    | > > | >
    | > > | > If I run lots of them in parallel, I get the following OOPs in a few
    | > > | > seconds:
    | > > |
    | > > | With the patch posted? You need the i vs nrbufs fix.
    | > >
    | > > Yes, it fixes the problem. I didn't try it before because I thought
    | > > you were going to double check it [1].
    | >
    | > Yeah the patch needs reworking, however the isolated i vs nrbufs fix is
    | > safe enough on its own. I'll post a full patch for inclusion, I'm afraid
    | > I wont be able to fully test it enough for submitting it until tomorrow
    | > though.
    |
    | Something like this, testing would be appreciated! Michael, can you
    | repeat your testing as well? Thanks.

    Yeah, it fixes the problem for 2.6.18-rc1.

    But doesn't compile for 2.6.17.4:

    CC fs/splice.o
    fs/splice.c: In function `link_pipe':
    fs/splice.c:1378: warning: implicit declaration of function `mutex_lock_nested'
    fs/splice.c:1378: error: `I_MUTEX_PARENT' undeclared (first use in this function)
    fs/splice.c:1378: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
    fs/splice.c:1378: error: for each function it appears in.)
    fs/splice.c:1379: error: `I_MUTEX_CHILD' undeclared (first use in this function)
    make[1]: ** [fs/splice.o] Erro 1
    make: ** [fs] Erro 2

    Should we use the first patch for it? It does work too.

    --
    Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-09 18:47    [W:0.024 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site