lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] firmware version management: add firmware_version()
From
Date
Hi Arjan,

> > It would be good if a driver knows which firmware version will be
> > written to the hardware. I'm talking about external firmware files
> > claimed by request_firmware().
> >
> > We know so many different firmware files for bcm43xx and it becomes
> > more and more complicated without some firmware version management.
> >
> > This patch can create the md5sum of a firmware file. Then it looks into
> > a table to figure out which version number is assigned to the hashcode.
> > That table is placed in the driver code and an example for bcm43xx comes
> > in my next mail. Any comments?
>
> why does this have to happen on the kernel side? Isn't it a lot easier
> and better to let the userspace side of things do this work, and even
> have a userspace file with the md5->version mapping? Or are there some
> practical considerations that make that hard to impossible?

I fully agree that we shouldn't put firmware versioning into the kernel
drivers. The pattern you give to request_firmware() can be mapped to any
file on the file system. And you also have the link to the device object
and I prefer you export a sysfs file for the version so that the helper
application loading the firmware can pick the right file.

Regards

Marcel


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-08 15:57    [W:0.056 / U:0.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site