[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
    On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:11 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
    > On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:41 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > > What is worse, these suspend systems will inevitable have
    > > different requirements on the rest of the kernel, and will thus
    > > complicate the heck out of it for the rest of the developers.
    > My (user level) understanding is that built in swsusp and Suspend2 use
    > the same (or almost the same) machinery in the rest of the kernel to do
    > the work.

    so they're almost the same conceptually... That's even more reason to go
    for one unified approach.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-08 15:21    [W:0.020 / U:56.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site