[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:11 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:41 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > What is worse, these suspend systems will inevitable have
> > different requirements on the rest of the kernel, and will thus
> > complicate the heck out of it for the rest of the developers.
> My (user level) understanding is that built in swsusp and Suspend2 use
> the same (or almost the same) machinery in the rest of the kernel to do
> the work.

so they're almost the same conceptually... That's even more reason to go
for one unified approach.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-08 15:21    [W:0.154 / U:3.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site