Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:13:59 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson |
| |
On Sat 2006-07-08 21:11:17, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:41 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > What is worse, these suspend systems will inevitable have > > different requirements on the rest of the kernel, and will thus > > complicate the heck out of it for the rest of the developers. > > My (user level) understanding is that built in swsusp and Suspend2 use > the same (or almost the same) machinery in the rest of the kernel to do > the work. I'm sure Nigel, Pavel and others can confirm or deny this.
It is pretty similar, yes.
> > No fancy shnazy GUI inside the kernel, but SIMPLE. > > AFAIK, none of the solutions have GUI inside the kernel.
Then you need to read suspend2 patch again. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |