[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] spinlocks: remove 'volatile'
    On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Chase Venters wrote:
    >Perhaps you should have followed this thread closely before composing your
    >assault on Linus. We're not talking about "asm volatile". We're talking
    >the "volatile" keyword as applied to variables. 'volatile' as applied to
    >inline ASM is of course necessary in many cases -- no one is disputing

    Ok, let's port a spinlock macro that spins instead of context switches
    instead of using the pthread garbage on IA64 or AMD64:

    #if ((defined (_M_IA64) || defined (_M_AMD64)) && !defined(NT_INTEREX))
    #include <windows.h>
    #pragma intrinsic (_InterlockedExchange)

    typedef volatile LONG lock_t[1];

    #define LockInit(v) ((v)[0] = 0)
    #define LockFree(v) ((v)[0] = 0)
    #define Unlock(v) ((v)[0] = 0)

    __forceinline void Lock(volatile LONG *hPtr)
    int iValue;

    for (;;) {
    iValue = _InterlockedExchange((LPLONG)hPtr, 1);
    if (iValue == 0)
    while (*hPtr);

    Please show me how I can write this to spinlock without using volatile.

    Trajce Nedev

    Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-08 08:47    [W:0.044 / U:3.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site