[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] spinlocks: remove 'volatile'
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Chase Venters wrote:
>Perhaps you should have followed this thread closely before composing your
>assault on Linus. We're not talking about "asm volatile". We're talking
>the "volatile" keyword as applied to variables. 'volatile' as applied to
>inline ASM is of course necessary in many cases -- no one is disputing

Ok, let's port a spinlock macro that spins instead of context switches
instead of using the pthread garbage on IA64 or AMD64:

#if ((defined (_M_IA64) || defined (_M_AMD64)) && !defined(NT_INTEREX))
#include <windows.h>
#pragma intrinsic (_InterlockedExchange)

typedef volatile LONG lock_t[1];

#define LockInit(v) ((v)[0] = 0)
#define LockFree(v) ((v)[0] = 0)
#define Unlock(v) ((v)[0] = 0)

__forceinline void Lock(volatile LONG *hPtr)
int iValue;

for (;;) {
iValue = _InterlockedExchange((LPLONG)hPtr, 1);
if (iValue == 0)
while (*hPtr);

Please show me how I can write this to spinlock without using volatile.

Trajce Nedev

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-08 08:47    [W:0.099 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site