lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: swsusp / suspend2 reliability
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0200, grundig wrote:
> You may ask "why not merge suspend2", but from an objective
> POV it's perfectly fine that some people asks "why don't
> suspend2 people try to improve swsusp instead of rewritting
> it? It may be easier to fix swsusp than replacint it with
> suspend2"

Suspend2 is an improvement on swsusp. What Pavel wants is something
completely different and even less tested that suspend2 called
uswsusp.

OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-07 19:47    [W:0.314 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site