Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:44:24 +0200 | From | Olivier Galibert <> | Subject | Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability |
| |
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0200, grundig wrote: > You may ask "why not merge suspend2", but from an objective > POV it's perfectly fine that some people asks "why don't > suspend2 people try to improve swsusp instead of rewritting > it? It may be easier to fix swsusp than replacint it with > suspend2"
Suspend2 is an improvement on swsusp. What Pavel wants is something completely different and even less tested that suspend2 called uswsusp.
OG.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |