Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-mm6 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:44:05 +0100 |
| |
Ar Gwe, 2006-07-07 am 13:14 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jeff Garzik: > Most older controllers always fall into pata_, most newer into sata_, > and an odd few ata_ > > Its a bug if you don't help maintain these assumptions :)
It would be very hard to do so. Almost anything can and (alas) did have sata bridges nailed to it early on. Almost every later highpoint, promise and ati chip has been found with SATA bridges attached.
I've tried to follow the convention on the basis of "not usually found nailed to a SATA bridge chip". If we want to be strict then most of pata_ is ata_ and the prefix really isn't useful.
Easy move to make and submit but is it actually useful to do so ?
And what about IDE/SATA convertor boards ?
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |