Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:07:18 +0200 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion |
| |
Adrian Ulrich schrieb am 2006-07-31:
> Ehr: Such a migration (on a very busy system) takes *some* time (weeks). > Re-Doing (migrate users back / recreate the FS / start again) the whole > thing isn't really an option..
All the more important to think about FS requirements *before* newfs-ing if a quick "one day for rsync/star/dump+restore" isn't available. If you're hitting, for instance, the hash collision problem in reiser3, you're as dead as with a FS without inodes.
> > > Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action? > > > > No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I > > will. > > Why?
I'm trying to shift my focus away from computer administration and better file systems than old-style non-journalling, non-softupdates UFS are available today and more will follow.
Cc: list weeded out.
-- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |