[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] GPU device layer patchset (00/07)

> >Where can I find more info on why this might be nice?
> >Or simply more info on what this actually does for me?
> It does nothing for you yet, it is just step one for getting the DRM and
> framebuffer drivers to co-exist in the driver model world, with the next
> step being allowing a channel of communication between the two layers with
> a view that later I can ask the DRM to disable fbdev or pass info to it..
> Why do we not want fbdev and DRM in one driver? as it would break way too
> many existing systems..
> It also allows DRM to get called at suspend/resume time.

Looks good to me. I guess I should get DRM working...

I actually tried a bit, and got some reasonably-recent Xserver here,
but now I get

root@amd:/home/pavel# glxinfo
name of display: :0.0

ERROR! sizeof(I830DRIRec) does not match passed size from device
libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs.
libGL error: InitDriver failed
libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
server glx extensions:

(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-31 14:45    [W:0.041 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site