Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:17:42 +0200 | From | "Jesper Juhl" <> | Subject | Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5 |
| |
On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > > > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite. > > > Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression > suite.... > That's nice.
Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out?
Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked against?" - can you comment on that?
-- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |