Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:07:18 +0400 | From | Alexey Starikovskiy <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4 |
| |
Do I understand your logs right and acpi-cpufreq is already loaded and works on your processor? Do you have any info in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq ? Why do you want to load p4-clockmod over it? It does not save you any power, just limits performance.
Regards, Alex.
bert hubert wrote: >> I have similar problem with cpufreq-nforce2 -- http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/7/234 >> I haven't do a git-bisect yet. > > To recap, cpufreq died for at least two people (Tomasz Torcz and me) between > 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc1. I've cc'd everybody who touched cpufreq according to > the shortlog. > > Abundant details are in: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/30/87 > > New information is that I've narrowed it down from between 2.6.16.9 and > 2.6.18-rc1 to between 2.6.17.7 (which works) and 2.6.18-rc1 (which doesn't). > > The problem exists both with cpufreq as modules and staticly, and both with > P4 and nforce2. > > Please let me know how I can help you solve this problem. I'll try a git > bisect but a lot of the cpufreq changes appear to be interrelated, so I'm > unsure if it will work. > > Thanks! > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |