Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:33:25 -0500 | From | David Masover <> | Subject | Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion) |
| |
Łukasz Mierzwa wrote: > Dnia Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:31:59 +0200, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> > napisał: > >> Nikita Danilov wrote: >> >>> As you see, ext2 code already has multiple file "plugins", with >>> persistent "plugin id" (stored in i_mode field of on-disk struct >>> ext2_inode). >> >> Aha! So here's another question: Is it fair to ask Reiser4 to make its >> plugins generic, or should we be asking ext2/3 first? >> > > Doesn't iptables have plugins? Maybe we should make them generic so > other packet filters can use them ;)
Hey, yeah! I mean, not everyone wants to run the ipchains emulation on top of iptables! Some people really want to run ipchains with iptables plugins!
</sarcasm>
It is REALLY time for this discussion to get technical again, and to go way, way over my head. And it's time for me to go build my MythTV box, and see if I can shake out some Reiser4 bugs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |