[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Battery-related regression between 2.6.17-git3 and 2.6.17-git6

    On Sunday 02 July 2006 11:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > On Sunday 02 July 2006 00:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > With the recent -git on my box (Asus L5D, x86_64 SUSE 10) the powersave
    > > demon is apparently unable to get the battery status, although the data in
    > > /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0 seem to be correct. As a result, battery status
    > > notification via kpowersave doesn't work and it's hard to notice when the
    > > battery is low/critical.
    > >
    > > So far I have verified that this feature works fine with 2.6.17-git3 and
    > > doesn't work with 2.6.17-git6 (-git5 doesn't compile here).
    > >
    > > I'll try to get more information tomorrow (unless someone in the know has
    > > an idea of what's up ;-) ).
    > I've verified that the problem first appeared in 2.6.17-git4.

    Apparently this happens because powersaved takes the battery status
    information from hald and the following kernel changes make hald crash on
    my system:;a=commit;h=43104f1da88f5335e9a45695df92a735ad550dda;a=commit;h=bd00949647ddcea47ce4ea8bb2cfcfc98ebf9f2a;a=commit;h=c182274ffe1277f4e7c564719a696a37cacf74ea;a=commit;h=9bde7497e0b54178c317fac47a18be7f948dd471;a=commit;h=36679ea59846d8f34a48f71ca1a37671ca0ad3c5

    (ie. after reverting them hald works again).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-03 13:18    [W:0.038 / U:4.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site