Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:00:38 -0400 | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: ext4 features |
| |
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:34:18 EDT, Bill Davidsen said: > > >>I think he is talking about another problem. RAID addresses detectable >>failures at the hardware level. I believe that he wants validation after >>the data is returned (without error) from the device. While in most >>cases if what you wrote and what you read don't match it's memory, >>improving the chances of catching the error is useful, given that >>non-server often lacks ECC on memory, or people buy cheaper non-parity >>memory. >> >> > >There's other issues as well. Why do people run 'tripwire' on boxes that >have RAID on them? > > What has RAID got to do with detecting hacking?
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |