[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subject[RFC] change netdevice to use struct device instead of struct class_device
    I have a patch here that converts the network device structure to use
    the struct device instead of struct class_device structure. It's a bit
    too big to post here, so it's at:

    I can split it out, but then it will not build for the intermediate
    steps, which 'git bisect' users might not appreciate. If you all want
    me to break it up to make it easier to review, please let me know and
    I'll be glad to do it.

    With this patch applied, sysfs now looks like:
    $ tree /sys/class/net/
    |-- eth0 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.2/0000:03:0e.0/eth0
    |-- gerg -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.2/0000:03:0c.0/gerg
    `-- lo -> ../../devices/lo

    Instead of the different directories being in /sys/class/net.

    What this buys us is now the different network devices can be called by
    the core when the system is shutting down or restoring, with the
    suspend/resume changes that Linus has written (and are now in -mm).
    This can be used by the network core to stop the queue, or whatever else
    it desires.

    Other good things happen with this, as the network devices are now real
    devices, instead of the second-class citizens that "class_device" was.
    (which is one reason why I'm getting rid of class_device entirely).

    The patch needs some other changes to the driver core that are also in
    my git tree, and included in the -mm release. Specifically these
    patches are needed:

    And if you are curious, the suspend stuff from Linus is at:

    I can gladly keep this in my tree (due to the previously mentioned
    requirements) and eventually merge it with Linus after 2.6.18 is out, if
    no one objects to it.


    greg k-h

    p.s. That bonding code! WTF is going on with poking around in the
    internals of krefs? And why are you returning more than one value
    from a sysfs file? I thought I asked that this stuff be fixed up a
    long time ago?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-04 00:53    [W:0.023 / U:0.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site