[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by regarding reiser4 inclusion)
    Horst H. von Brand wrote:
    > Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
    > [...]
    >> It is then simple to follow that train of logic: why not make it easy
    >> to replace the directory algorithm [and associated metadata]? or the
    >> file data space management algorithms? or even the inode handling?
    >> why not allow customers to replace a stock algorithm with an exotic,
    >> site-specific one?
    > IMVHO, such experiments should/must be done in userspace. And AFAICS, they
    > can today.

    inode handling? Really?

    But what's wrong with people doing such experiments outside the kernel?
    AFAICS, "exotic, site-specific one" is not something that would be
    considered for inclusion.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-28 17:51    [W:0.021 / U:2.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site