Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:40:04 -0400 | | From | Josef Sipek <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6) |
| |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:51:10AM +0200, ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote: ... > Hope it make some sense.
Fair enough.
> PS > If I got you wrong and you meant why it can't be defined where it is used, I > refere you to Andrew's mail "[patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE", where a > redefinition occured (of TRUE/FALSE).
You first guess was right.
Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
-- NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |