lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Yes and that's what we have been saying all along. When you want
> performance, you use SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN and let the allocator do its job.
> I don't see much point from API point of view for the caller to explicitly
> ask for a given alignment and then in addition pass a 'yes I really meant'
> flag (SLAB_DEBUG_OVERRIDE).

Btw, /proc/slabinfo for UML with defconfig reveals change for only one
cache with my patch applied. The 'dquot' cache is created by dquot_init in
fs/dquot.c and doesn't really seem to need the alignment for anything...

Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-27 07:49    [W:0.050 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site