[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Manfred Spraul wrote:

> > Thus the patch is correct, it's a bug in the slab allocator. If
> > > is set, then the allocator ignores align or ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN.
> >
> >
> > But then Heiko does not want to set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN at all. This is not
> > the issue we are discussing. In the DEBUG case he wants
> > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to be enforced even if ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is not set.
> >
> The kmalloc caches are allocated with HWCACHE_ALIGN+ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN. The
> logic in kmem_cache_create didn't handle that case correctly.
> On most architectures, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is 0. Thus SLAB_DEBUG redzones
> everything.
> On s390, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is 8. This disables redzoning.
> Ok?

So Redzoning etc will now be diabled regardless even if
ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is not set but another alignment is given to

So we sacrifice the ability to worsen the performance of slabs by
misaligning them for debugging purposes.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-26 21:03    [W:0.035 / U:3.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site