[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
Pekka J Enberg wrote:

>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>We only specify ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, since that aligns only the kmalloc
>>caches, but it doesn't disable debugging on other caches that are created
>>via kmem_cache_create() where an alignment of e.g. 0 is specified.
>>The point of the first patch is: why should the slab cache be allowed to chose
>>an aligment that is less than what the caller specified? This does very likely
>>break things.
>Ah, yes, you are absolutely right. We need to respect caller mandated
>alignment too. How about this?
Good catch - I obviously never tested the code for an HWCACHE_ALIGN cache...

> Pekka
>[PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment
>Ensure cache alignment is always at minimum what the architecture or
>caller mandates even if slab debugging is enabled.
>Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-26 20:11    [W:0.053 / U:21.460 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site