[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: what is necessary for directory hard links
Horst H. von Brand <> wrote:

> Joshua Hudson <> wrote:
>> This patch is the sum total of all that I had to change in the kernel
>> VFS layer to support hard links to directories
> Can't be done, as it creates the possibility of loops.

Don't do that then?

> The "only files can
> be hardlinked" idea makes garbage collection (== deleting of unreachable
> objects) simple: Just check the number of references.
> Detecting unconnected subgraphs uses a /lot/ of memory; and much worse, you
> have to stop (almost) all filesystem activity while doing it.

In order to disconnect a directory, you'd have to empty it first, and after
emptying a directory, it won't be part of a loop. Maybe emtying is the
problem ...

This feature was implemented, and I asume it was removed for a reason.
Can somebody remember?
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-22 19:03    [W:0.066 / U:28.416 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site