lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: kernel/timer.c: next_timer_interrupt() strange/buggy(?) code (2.6.18-rc1-mm2)
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:53:30 +0200, Andreas Mohr said:
    > Hi all,
    >

    > for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
    > j = INDEX(i);
    > do {

    > if (j < (INDEX(i)) && i < 3)
    > list = varray[i + 1]->vec + (INDEX(i + 1));
    > goto found;
    > } while (j != (INDEX(i)));
    > }
    > found:

    > Excuse me, but why do we have a while loop here if the last instruction in
    > the while loop is a straight "goto found"?

    Consider if we take the 'goto found' when i==1. We leave not only the do/while
    but also the for loop. A 'continue' instead would leave the do/while and then
    drive the i==2 and subsequent 'for' iterations....

    (Unless my C mastery has severely faded of late?)
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-17 22:01    [W:0.026 / U:34.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site