lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Reiser4 Inclusion
From
Date
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:02:15 PDT, Caleb Gray said:
> Reiser4's responsiveness is undoubtedly at least twice as fast as ext3.
> I have deployed two nearly identical servers in Florida (I live in
> Washington state) but one difference: one uses ext3 and the other
> reiser4. The ping time of the reiser4 server is (on average) 20ms faster
> than the ext3 server.

OK, I'll bite. What *POSSIBLE* reason is there for the choice of filesystem
to matter to an ICMP Echo Request/Reply? I'm suspecting something else,
like the ext3 server needs to re-ARP before sending the Echo Reply, or some
such.

> and directory structures. (Both of the filesystems have slowed down at a
> similar pace for the duration of their lifetime [about 15ms].)

Unclear why *that* should matter to ICMP either.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-17 20:09    [W:0.258 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site