lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8
On 12/07/06, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/07/06, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/07/06, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Here is a slabinfo from current 2.6.18-rc1-git4 and 2.6.18-rc1 +
> > > kmemleak http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/slab.txt
> >
> > Thanks. Does it make any difference if you enable
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMLEAK_TASK_STACKS? Also, if you save the memleak file
> > periodically, do any of the context_struct_to_string reports disappear
> > (I can investigate this if you upload a few ml60.txt, mk61.txt etc.)?
>
> Here are the results
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/ml/

The context_struct_to_string leaks do not seem to disappear in
subsequent ml?.txt files which makes me think it's a real leak.

Thanks for collecting these statistics.

--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-12 18:15    [W:0.064 / U:2.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site