Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:12:40 +0100 | From | "Catalin Marinas" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8 |
| |
On 12/07/06, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/06, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/07/06, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Here is a slabinfo from current 2.6.18-rc1-git4 and 2.6.18-rc1 + > > > kmemleak http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/slab.txt > > > > Thanks. Does it make any difference if you enable > > CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMLEAK_TASK_STACKS? Also, if you save the memleak file > > periodically, do any of the context_struct_to_string reports disappear > > (I can investigate this if you upload a few ml60.txt, mk61.txt etc.)? > > Here are the results > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/ml/
The context_struct_to_string leaks do not seem to disappear in subsequent ml?.txt files which makes me think it's a real leak.
Thanks for collecting these statistics.
-- Catalin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |