lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 0/7] execns syscall and user namespace
    > I haven't had a chance to do a thorough review yet but why is
    > this needed?
    >
    > What can be left shared by switching to a new namespace and then
    > execing an executable?
    >
    > Is it not possible to ensure what you are trying to ensure with
    > a good user space executable?

    I agree with Eric. In OpenVZ we don't do exec(), because executable itself ensures
    correct environment.

    Do we need to overcomplicate kernel in this regard?

    Thanks,
    Kirill

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-12 13:15    [W:0.023 / U:33.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site