[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:57:35 -0600 (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> Andrew Morton <> writes:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:38:59 -0600
> > (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >
> >> Since sys_sysctl is deprecated start allow it to be compiled out.
> >
> > This could be a tough one to get rid of (looks at sys_bdflush() again).
> >
> > I'd suggest we put a sys_bdflush()-style warning in there, see what that
> > flushes out.
> Sounds sane. I know I have booted several kernels with it compiled out
> but just because you can do without it doesn't mean that something
> isn't using it.
> Hmm. The question is where do I want the put the warning message?
> When the code is compiled out?
> When the code is compiled in?

Both. We want to find out who is using it.

> Probably both places at this point, and using the rate limited printk
> I think instead of just the 5 printks that sys_bdflush uses...

No, I think five is enough. If something's using sys_sysctl() then it
might be using it a lot - there's no point in irritating people over it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-11 09:07    [W:0.101 / U:2.072 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site