Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:46:27 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step? |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 11:22 -0700, ysgrifennodd H. Peter Anvin: >> You know how much code there is in glibc to make your /bin/ls still work? > > A static linked pre libc 2.2 (thats libc not glibc) ls works fine today, > as does a 0.98.5 era built rogue binary
Didn't work when I tried it, although that was a shared binary (and yes, I had the library there.) I assumed mostly that ZMAGIC support had bitrotted -- even back in '95 there was a lot of problems with ZMAGIC binaries when ext2 block size was > 1K.
-hpa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |