Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:02:27 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson |
| |
Hi!
> > >> so that it's as > > >> feature-rich as the other one. > > >> > > > > > > this is one of the things that bothers me. > > > "features features features" > > > lets first get the basics right and working. > > > Once we have that in tree for a release or two and it's really > > > reliable... THEN and only THEN work on adding features. > > > > > hmm...could it be that we "features, features, features" in suspend2 > > because nigel & co did get the basics right? > > As I said... if that is the case then it'd be easy to first merge "the > right basics", get that solid, and THEN add the features. So far I've > not seen that happen.
Well.. Nigel claims his code can not be split into reasonable chunks.
I actually wanted to get a version without advanced features (userspace splash, compression, encryption, plugins), but he claims it is not possible. Rafael is trying to persuade him to split out at least freezer out... Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |