Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:58:49 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc1] genirq: {en,dis}able_irq_wake() need refcounting too |
| |
* David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
> It's not just "normal" mode operation that needs refcounting for the > {en,dis}able_irq() calls ... "wakeup" mode calls need it too, for the > very same reasons. > > This patch adds that refcounting. I expect that some ARM drivers will > be triggering the new warning, but this call isn't yet widely used. > (Which is probably why the bug has lingered this long...)
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
we should also add disable_irq_wake() / enable_irq_wake() APIs and start migrating most ARM users over to the new APIs, agreed? That makes the APIs more symmetric and the code more readable too.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |