[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3: bad unlock ordering (reiser4?)
Ingo Molnar wrote:

> if (atomic_read(&node->d_count) != 0) {
> return 0;
> }
>why the braces, when on the next line it's not done:
> if (blocknr_is_fake(jnode_get_block(node)))
> return 0;
>it looks quite inconsistent.
I have a (roughly adhered to) rule that I don't hassle programmers much
about the style of any code that I can easily read. I truly do not care
where the braces are, I care if the comments and variable names are well
done. So that is why, and yes, I know I am an unusual manager on this
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-09 23:38    [W:0.042 / U:4.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site