Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Idea about a disc backed ram filesystem | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Fri, 09 Jun 2006 16:03:22 -0400 |
| |
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:43 -0300, Matheus Izvekov wrote: > On 6/9/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:27 -0300, Matheus Izvekov wrote: > > > Sorry, i took a look at the code which handles this and swappiness = 0 > > > doesnt seem to imply that process memory will never be swapped out. > > > > > > > OK, then use mlockall(). > > > > Lee > > > > > > If i make init mlockall, would all child processes be mlocked too?
No.
> If not, using this to enforce a system wide policy seems a bit hacky > and non trivial. >
Well, what you are trying to do seems hacky. What real world problem are you trying to solve that setting swappiness to 0 is not sufficient for?
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |