lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Alex Tomas wrote:
>>
>> would "#if CONFIG_EXT3_EXTENTS" be a good solution then?
>
> Let's put it this way:
> - have you had _any_ valid argument at all against "ext4"?
>
> Think about it. Honestly. Tell me anything that doesn't work?

It's about bundling. It's about being able to take your 3-year old
dependable car and make it faster by bolting on new manifolds and
turbochargers, rather than waiting a year for the manufacturer to release
a totally new model (and buying totally new cars often means you're part
of the manufacturer's debugging group, so be prepared to have things fail
which require warranty work).

Now, granted, I really do agree with you about the whole code sharing
thing. A fresh start is often just what you need. I'm just questioning if
it wouldn't be better to do this fresh start immediately after going
48-bit, rather than before. That way, existing users that want that extra
umph can have it today.

> Linus

Cheers,
Chase
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-09 20:53    [W:0.397 / U:2.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site