lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
    From
    Date
    >>>>> Matthew Frost (MF) writes:

    MF> Alex Tomas wrote:
    >>>>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes:
    JG> Think about how this will be deployed in production, long term.
    JG> If extents are not made default at some point, then no one will
    >> use
    JG> the feature, and it should not be merged.
    >> sorry, I disagree. for example, NUMA isn't default and shouldn't be.
    >> but we have it in the tree and any one may choose to use it.

    MF> NUMA is designed to cope with a hardware feature, which not everybody
    MF> has. Filesystem upgrades are not qualitatively similar; it does not
    MF> depend on one's hardware design as to whether one uses ext3, let alone
    MF> extents. Your logic is faulty.

    proposed 48bit extents patch addresses 2TB limit.


    thanks, Alex
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-09 20:11    [W:0.022 / U:33.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site