[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
> Jeff's approach taken to the rediculous would mean that we'd have
> ext versions 1-40 by now at least. I don't think that helps much,
> either.

On the other hand, I _guarantee_ you that it helps that we have ext2-3,
and not just ext2 (nobody even tried to keep ext1 compatible, thank the

If for no other reason, than the fact that the ext3 development could be
much more aggressive early on. Exactly because it did NOT screw up the old
filesystem that everybody else depended on.

So we have empirical evidence that splitting filesystem work up does
actually help.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.257 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site