[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.17-rc6-mm1
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:47:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> - Many more lockdep updates

Needs more.

[ BUG: possible deadlock detected! ]
nfsd/11429 is trying to acquire lock:
(&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c032286a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

but task is already holding lock:
(&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c032286a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

which could potentially lead to deadlocks!

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by nfsd/11429:
#0: (hash_sem){----}, at: [<d10d0364>] exp_readlock+0x0/0x3e [nfsd]
#1: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c032286a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

stack backtrace:
[<c0104966>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x54/0xfd
[<c0104f1a>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c010502f>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<c013b2d4>] __lockdep_acquire+0x8f6/0x912
[<c013b346>] lockdep_acquire+0x56/0x6f
[<c03226cf>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xae/0x228
[<c032286a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
[<d10cdb64>] nfsd_setattr+0x2d3/0x49f [nfsd]
[<d10ceecd>] nfsd_create_v3+0x319/0x4aa [nfsd]
[<d10d413e>] nfsd3_proc_create+0x125/0x135 [nfsd]
[<d10ca0d4>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc0/0x178 [nfsd]
[<d0ee89e9>] svc_process+0x38d/0x5d5 [sunrpc]
[<d10ca581>] nfsd+0x18b/0x302 [nfsd]
[<c0102005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb

It's too close to bedtime for me, and on a cursory examination,
I don't even see where nfsd_setattr touches a mutex.

This was triggered by a simple 'touch foo' over an nfs v3 mount.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-08 07:04    [W:0.144 / U:1.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site