lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: mutex vs. local irqs (Was: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans)
Hi,

On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> > On ppc it should not be that difficult to even modify the exception entry
> > code. Instead of calling do_IRQ use do_early_IRQ and only install the real
> > handler later.
>
> Yes, it's possible, but will add overhead to the common IRQ path just
> to handle an early boot special case.

What I mean is to directly patch the exception entry code, so after the
initialization is complete you'll have no additional overhead.
In the EXC_XFER_TEMPLATE() macro the handler is stored at i##n. You can
either export that address or you can use a special transfer handler,
which automatically patches the values once some flag is set.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-08 16:05    [W:0.091 / U:1.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site