[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: genirq

* Daniel Walker <> wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > there hasnt been any real problem since the MSI one. The core bits are
> > rather stable. The patch-queue had positive input from the maintainers
> > of the two architectures with the most complex IRQ hardware (arm and
> > ppc*), and that's reassuring. But in any case, other architectures are
> > not affected at all (sans brow paperbag build bugs and typos), their
> > __do_IRQ() handling remains unchanged. So i'd like to see this in
> > 2.6.18. (there a good deal of stuff we have ontop of genirq)
> There was a problem reported by Kevin Hillman , the -v5 version was
> not functional on ARM omap boards .. Was that handled already in -v6?

Daniel - you should be aware that the -mm genirq lineup does _not_
include the ARM bits. Those changes go via the normal ARM QA and merge
path, i.e. via rmk. The -mm lineup only includes the generic bits (for
type-based platforms). In any case, they dont impact upstream genirq
merging plans.

(The omap thing in the armirq queue is likely some small thing. Thomas
is checking it.)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-07 10:46    [W:0.156 / U:5.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site