Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:03:00 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:35 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:07:06 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > This patch was already sent on: > > > > - 26 Jun 2006 > > > > - 27 Apr 2006 > > > > - 19 Apr 2006 > > > > - 11 Apr 2006 > > > > - 10 Mar 2006 > > > > - 29 Jan 2006 > > > > - 21 Jan 2006 > > > > > > 3 days ago? That seems a bit silly. Why didn't you just ping Andrew on > > > it? > > > > > > Andrew, what's the status of this? Can we get an ACK or a NACK before > > > this starts getting reposted every day? ;-) > > > > > > > I am stolidly letting the arch maintainers and the developer of this > > feature work out what to do. > > Bah, options that are not Required should default to n. > I support Adrian's patch.
Agreed:
- Most people don't use it - There's a performance hit
Clearly should default to N.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |