Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [patch] Declare explicit, hardware based lock ranking in serio | | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | | Date | Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:11:17 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 07:56 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:50, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > Thanks. > > > > > > So we're taking ps2->cmd_mutex and then we're recurring back into > > > ps2_command() and then taking ps2->serio->cmd_mutex. > > > > > > I suspect that's all correct/natural/expected and needs another > > > make-lockdep-shut-up patch. > > > > > > The PS/2 code has a natural device order and there is a one level > > recursion in this device order in terms of the cmd_mutex; annotate > > this explicit recursion as ok > > > > It is not necessarily single depth - one could have 2 or more pass-through > ports chained together, although currently in kernel we only have Synaptics > pass-through. If we were ever to implement pass-through port for IBMs > trackpoints then we'd have: > > Synaptics<->pass-through<->TP<->pass-through<->some mouse
is there a bound to this? lockdep can deal with upto 8 or so recursions.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |